tactical-wins-constant-challenges-mark-india-s-maoist-offensive

The long-standing conflict between India and Maoist insurgents appears to be reaching a critical juncture. Recent weeks have witnessed a surge in operations by security forces across the central and eastern parts of the nation, resulting in notable tactical successes against Maoist fighters. Significant clashes, particularly in Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, have led to the deaths of numerous Maoist cadres, signalling a clear change in the government's approach to eliminating left-wing extremism.

 

A particularly impactful operation, code-named "Operation Black Forest," unfolded over three weeks, from April 21 to May 11, 2025. This coordinated effort between the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and Chhattisgarh Police took place in the difficult terrain of the Karegutta Hills, located along the Chhattisgarh-Telangana border. The operation culminated in the deaths of 31 Maoists, including 16 female combatants. Among those killed were key figures from the People's Liberation Guerrilla Army (PLGA) and the influential Dandakaranya Special Zonal Committee, both central to the Maoist military strategy.

 

This offensive also significantly disrupted the insurgents' infrastructure. Security forces discovered and dismantled hidden weapon caches, bomb-making facilities, and logistical support centres used by the rebels. Over 450 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) were found and neutralized during the operation, reducing future threats to both security personnel and civilians. Officials have described this operation as one of the most comprehensive and strategically successful actions in India’s history of combating Naxalism.

 

Several months’ prior, another encounter had deeply impacted the Maoist ranks. In October 2024, within the dense forests of the Abujhmarh region in Chhattisgarh, government forces killed 38 insurgents in a carefully planned assault. This reportedly marked the single deadliest encounter involving Maoist forces in decades, highlighting the increasing dominance of the security establishment in regions previously considered rebel strongholds.

 

Also read: IAEA calls Pak’s nuclear bluff

 

Home Minister Amit Shah has openly praised the security forces for these achievements. He recently stated that India is on track to be free from the Maoist threat by March 2026, asserting that the “national flag now flies proudly in areas once dominated by red terror.” These symbolic pronouncements, combined with the reallocation of security resources, have fostered a sense of optimism within the central government regarding its counterinsurgency strategy.

 

India's strategy now extends beyond purely military actions. It encompasses a broad network of development and administrative initiatives aimed at re-establishing state authority in remote tribal areas. Infrastructure projects, including roads and telecommunication towers, have been accelerated in regions previously deemed inaccessible. Programs such as the Special Infrastructure Scheme (SIS) and Special Central Assistance (SCA) are being implemented to enhance governance and public amenities. Furthermore, the establishment of security outposts and forward-operating bases within jungle interiors is helping to solidify gains and prevent the return of Maoist influence.

 

Despite these advancements, the broader implications of this forceful approach deserve careful consideration. While military successes garner attention, they may not sufficiently address the underlying socio-economic factors that fuel the insurgency. The Maoist movement, despite its violent tactics, draws its strength from legitimate grievances, including land dispossession, exploitation of tribal communities, environmental damage, and limited access to justice.

 

The tribal heartlands of central India remain among the nation's most underdeveloped regions. Decades of neglect, coupled with a lack of responsive governance, have created fertile ground for insurgent ideologies. The use of force alone cannot resolve these long-standing injustices. Instead, an inclusive model of development — one that respects local customs, rights, and aspirations — is necessary to break the cycle of violence and marginalisation.

 

The moral and human dimensions of these operations also warrant attention. The killing of 16 female Maoist fighters during Operation Black Forest has reignited debate about the gendered aspects of both insurgency and counterinsurgency. Many of these women join rebel groups not solely due to ideology but often in search of empowerment and security in regions where state institutions are absent or oppressive. Their deaths, therefore, raise uncomfortable questions about the nature of justice and the limitations of state power.

 

Furthermore, the risk of unintended harm — both physical and psychological — to innocent villagers living in conflict zones is ever-present. Allegations of excessive force, wrongful arrests, and disruptions to daily life can undermine the legitimacy of counterinsurgency efforts. The state must therefore proceed with caution to avoid alienating the very people it aims to protect.

 

While India’s recent anti-Maoist offensives represent a peak in tactical and operational success, the path to lasting peace remains intricate and challenging. A purely military-focused approach may temporarily suppress violence, but it cannot dismantle the ideological and social underpinnings of the insurgency. To truly conclude the Maoist chapter, India must combine force with empathy — delivering justice, dignity, and development to the nation's most marginalised citizens.