News Arena

Home

Nation

States

International

Politics

Opinion

Economy

Sports

Entertainment

Trending:

Home
/

malegaon-verdict-hypocrisy-if-not-challenged-in-sc-says-owaisi

Politics

Malegaon verdict: 'Hypocrisy' if not challenged in SC,says Owaisi

As reactions from political circles came in when the news broke , AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi  expressed disappointment over the acquittal of all accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, calling it a result of a “deliberately shoddy investigation and prosecution”. He also sued the term 'hypocrisy' of the government over handling the cases of terrorism if verdict is not challenged in the Supreme Court.

News Arena Network - New Delhi - UPDATED: July 31, 2025, 05:56 PM - 2 min read

AIMIM chief and MP Asadidin Owaisi


As reactions from political circles came in when the news broke , AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi  expressed disappointment over the acquittal of all accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, calling it a result of a “deliberately shoddy investigation and prosecution”. He also sued the term 'hypocrisy' of the government over handling the cases of terrorism if verdict is not challenged in the Supreme Court.


This comes after Mumbai's NIA special court acquitted all seven accused of being involved in the 2008 Malegaon blasts. The 2008 Malegaon blast case was transferred to the NIA in 2011 from the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS). After a 17-year-long wait and examination of hundreds of witnesses, the NIA special court today acquitted all seven people accused under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Arms Act and all other charges.

 

“The Malegaon blast case verdict is disappointing. Six namazis were killed in the blast and nearly 100 were injured. They were targeted for their religion. A deliberately shoddy investigation/prosecution is responsible for the acquittal,” the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief posted on X.


MP Asaduddin Owaisi questioned whether the Centre and Maharashtra governments would challenge the verdict. “Seventeen years after the blast, the Court has acquitted all of the accused for lack of evidence. Will the Modi and Fadnavis governments appeal the judgement the way they swiftly demanded stay in the Mumbai train blasts acquittals? Will Maharashtra’s ‘secular’ political parties demand accountability? Who killed the 6 people?”

 


He  also recalled former special public prosecutor Rohini Salian's allegation that she was asked to "go soft" on the accused. “Remember, in 2016 the then prosecutor in the case Rohini Salian went on record to say that NIA had asked her to ‘go soft’ on the accused. Remember, in 2017, NIA had tried to get Sadhvi Pragya acquitted. The same person would go on to be a BJP MP in 2019.”

 


He further mentioned slain ATS chief Hemant Karkare, who had initially probed the blast case before being killed in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. “Karkare had uncovered the conspiracy in Malegaon & was unfortunately killed by Pakistani terrorists in the 26/11 attacks. The BJP MP went on record saying that she had cursed him and his death was a consequence of his curse.”


Taking aim at the current government, Owaisi asked, “Will NIA/ATS officers be held accountable for their faulty investigation? I think we know the answer. This is the ‘tough on terror’ Modi government. The world will remember that it made a terror accused a Member of Parliament.”

 

 

No religion teaches violence, the court said. Terrorism has no religion, but the court cannot convict on mere perception, it added.

Special Judge AK Lahoti, assigned to hear cases of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) here, flagged several loopholes in the prosecution's case and the investigation carried out, and said the accused persons deserved the benefit of doubt.

 

 

Once the court acquitted the seven accused, they looked relieved with smiles on their faces. They thanked the judge and their lawyers.

The court while reading out the judgment said there was no "reliable and cogent" evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt."Mere suspicion cannot take the place of real proof," the court said, adding that in the absence of any evidence, the accused persons deserve the benefit of doubt.


"The overall evidence does not inspire confidence in the court to convict the accused. There is no reliable and cogent evidence to warrant conviction," the judge said while reading out the judgment. The court also said provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) were not applicable to the case.

 

 

TOP CATEGORIES

  • Nation

QUICK LINKS

About us Rss FeedSitemapPrivacy PolicyTerms & Condition
logo

2025 News Arena India Pvt Ltd | All rights reserved | The Ideaz Factory