The recent re-designation of the Advisor to the Administrator of Chandigarh as Chief Secretary, issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, marks a significant shift in the administrative structure of the Union Territory.
This move, widely seen as a departure from past practices, emphasises the central government's resolve to maintain Chandigarh's status as a Union Territory, potentially marginalising Punjab's longstanding claims over the city as its rightful capital.
Historically, Chandigarh has been associated with Punjab since its designation as the state capital in 1966. However, recent developments indicate a deviation from this understanding.
The decision to elevate the position of Chief Secretary indicates a higher level of administrative authority, traditionally held by senior IAS officers from the Union Territory cadre, rather than an officer with the rank of Additional Secretary to the Government of India.
This change sends a clear message that Chandigarh’s administrative independence is unlikely to be relinquished soon.
Moreover, it signals a diminishing consideration of Punjab’s historical and constitutional claims to the city, intensifying the ongoing debate over its governance.
Notably, the Punjab government, along with various political parties, has raised strong objections to this move.
They argue that unless the post is reserved for a Punjab cadre IAS officer, this could significantly impact Punjab’s influence over the administration of Chandigarh.
The issue touches on broader concerns about territorial rights and administrative control, with political leaders warning of a potential erosion of Punjab’s stake in the region.
The recent shift follows the end of Ajay Bhalla’s tenure as Union Home Secretary. Known for his balanced approach towards sensitive matters involving Punjab, his departure from the post has left the central bureaucracy more assertive in pursuing administrative changes.
The absence of consultation with the Punjab Government has been criticised as a disregard for the state’s interests, raising concerns about the autonomy of Chandigarh and its governance framework.
The move echoes the 2016 controversy when the Centre proposed appointing K.J. Alphons, a retired IAS officer and BJP leader, as Chandigarh’s Administrator, ending a 32-year tradition of the Punjab Governor serving in that capacity.
Despite strong opposition from Punjab’s political leadership, including the Shiromani Akali Dal Government, the appointment was eventually halted, preserving the historical administrative setup.
This recent decision, however, may reignite similar disputes. With Chandigarh’s status being a sensitive and emotive issue, any shift in its governance is likely to be met with heightened resistance from Punjab.
Key changes for Chandigarh UT
- The position of Chief Secretary will now be held by a senior IAS officer from the Union Territory cadre.
- Previously, the post was held by an officer with the rank of Additional Secretary to the Government of India.
- This shift signifies a higher level of administrative authority.
Follow us
